Reminder that NatPo is an american-owned rag.
With convicted felon and Trump ass kisser Convict Black as an Editor.
genuine question: this is all true, but what relevance does it have in relation to the content of the piece, in this case?
So is Mark Carney. Any comment on the substance of the article? Harper is a far right christian nationalist
Harper is more left wing than the US dems lol
This is absolutely not true, although I agree that the Dem establishment are indeed quite right wing. See Harper’s IDU for example. Even putting “left wing” in the same sentence as Harper is laughable, frankly
Harper is completely disinterested in identity politics and is never going to attack LGBT, or push Christianitiy in politics lol
Here is Harper explicitly pushing Christianity in politics
https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/hungary-lgbt-pride-anniversary/
and here is Harper-backed (and Trump-backed) Viktor Orban’s anti-LGBT politics
Does this change anything in terms of how you feel about Carney inviting Harper to this “summit”?
Fuck Harper, but if it chaps PP’s ass, I’m happy for it.
so … we have a hard-right PM and that’s cool because he wore a red shirt instead of a blue one? Trying to wrap my head around the logic of any of this
Liberal geniuses owning the … libs? Hey Lemmy me thinks we have an astroturf problem
Are you replying to yourself here?
They forgot to change the sockpuppet account.
i was responding to the downvotes lol jfc this liberal cult
like, if i had any sockpuppet accounts (I don’t) then don’t you think there would be evidence of that. fucking Carney cult brigade
Replying to your own comment an hour later to yell about astroturfing, then making two more comments to swear you aren’t mad about being called a sockpuppet. Totally normal, unbothered behaviour.
I’m responding to the fact that there are a bunch of downvotes on a post asking why it’s fine for Carney to chum it up with Stephen effing Harper on the basis that it’s not Poilievre
(I think the people who like Carney also like Harper)
what’s weird is they (well, most) pretend not to. It’s amazing that people are defending this mostly on the basis that it’s the NatPost reporting it — like, what do they think the Post’s secret evil game is here?
The comments rightfully criticizing the National Post are not defending Carney, stop conflating the two. Do not share Postmedia, always downvote.
There is a single comment in this thread endorsing Carney’s action, which deserves pushback, but you’re lashing out at everyone else for no reason.
sorry everyone didn’t know that’s against the rules
Sockpuppeting is frowned upon everywhere. You just destroyed any credibility you might have had. Well done.
hello, genius, i am using the same account and asking why replying to my own comment is somehow not ok. how is that “sockpuppeting” lol
I haven’t read enough to have an informed opinion on the specific event itself. But I’m revelling in the fact that it’s going to make the Maple Maga “Everything was better under Harper” crowd’s heads explode trying to cognitive dissonance their way out of this.
Ironically, it’s the Liberals’ reaction that is most worrying to me; the fact that Harper’s image is somehow being rehabilitated by his own project (Carney) is not cause for celebration, I’m afraid
Me too.
Fucking revolting.
The most accurate thing I’ve seen in a while is that Carney isn’t Canada’s PM, he’s our CEO. It’s both accurate and unfortunate.
The worst part is that so many people are still trying to use Poilievre as a way to justify this evil, instead of speaking up about how terrible Carney is
