I don’t think we will see union action that prevents consumers from getting fuels.

It’s my understanding that the fuel deal is to limit the public backlash against the government for the impacts of their war. North americans equate their cars with freedom and panic when they can’t get fuel, or it costs too much. There are more severe impacts to fuel shortages (transport cost goes up so costs of goods including food raise, and access to heating fuels becomes limited) but this is the most direct impact the consumer sees.

Even if the union members agree to it, they will face massive backlash.

(I think the people who like Carney also like Harper)

I did read the other replies, but held out hope I was missing something.

I have no idea how someone could read the Recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission and say such things. I am being generous and assuming all canadians who would speak on the relationship have read it.

First Nations are amongst the most pro crown, pro-supreme court of Canada, pro-court groups in Canada because they have relentlessly pursued justice through court cases and have slowly established a strong predicent.

Knowing how to operate within a system of oppression doesn’t mean it’s supported. How else would they be fighting for their rights?

Maybe I misunderstood and there is another reason you are saying there is broad support for these institutions.

It might interest you to know more!

https://humanrights.ca/story/what-two-spirit-part-one-origins

This is why you may see 2SLGBTQ+ especially when hearing from a canadian org.

I’m grateful to creative folks who find a way to take care of each other despite these obstacles.

I think doing nonsense might be the point. We can sit here and laugh at how foolish they look not bothering to look up what a cadet is but I think they don’t care and they don’t have to care and they are flexing on that.