• GodofLies@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    Canada - especially the federal government - is balls deep in with Microslop. Policy makers are 100% being lobbied + no idea how to even navigate the clusterfuck of a tech stack that’s been built up over the decades.

    But hey they going to keep mandating everyone to go back into the office and use Microslop Teams when US tech companies have already publicly said they cannot guarantee that Canadian data doesn’t get router through US servers. cue applause /s

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Even if the data stays in Canada on Canadian servers using Microslop systems the US can still get it because of the US CLOUD act.

  • patatas@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    regardless of any of this, we do not need hyperscale AI data centres for any reason whatsoever, fucking hell

  • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    It’s going to take years (and truckloads of money) to build domestic capacity to rival what the US companies currently have. And then you will have to pay that money back with a much smaller total potential customer base, while competing against established international competitors with deeper pockets.

    It’s not impossible, and some players will absolutely be able to chip away at it, but it’s not going to be as easy or fast as people what it to be.

    • AGM@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      Canada’s small population to serve inference to is an advantage to some extent in such a capex heavy space, but the money being committed federally is pretty tiny. I look at $3.3 billion committed for AI over 5 years when compared with $60B for new subs, $3B for Arctic patrol ships, and up to $27B on F-35s if we go through with that order and don’t think we’re being serious about sovereign AI at all. We don’t have to be an OpenAI spending half a trillion on data centers for training and inference to reach a market of a billion+ people, but $3.3B over 5 years is not being serious about carving out our own independence from hyperscalers.

  • AGM@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m waiting to see what comes as a final version of the national AI strategy, but what my feeling for a while is that what we’re seeing with AI in Canada is very reminiscent of what we’ve seen in O&G, but even more lopsided. Lots of US ownership, raw material (both mineral and data) coming from Canada but with value-added processes owned by US companies, revenue that will flow south, and lock-in to their systems.

    • SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      We have zero PhDs in Parliament, 7% STEM degrees. No one understands AI so any strategy will be written by lobbyists.

  • melsaskca@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m Canadian. I’ve got some old disc drives and usb sticks in the back of my closet that I’m not using anymore. I will contribute them to Canada so we can store our own data in our own data silos. BOOM! Tech problem solved! /s