I agree they are within their right to do it, I’m saying it legally wouldn’t survive a challenge in court the way they implemented it.

No need for your combative tone or assuming I have slop that needs hosting.

It’s more than just the ‘mostly’. In legal proceedings they would really struggle to ‘demonstrate cause’, i.e. what is copyrighted, and what is not - not to mention demonstrating criminal intent.

As I wrote before, these are phase 2 effects of a new emerging technology. All it will take is one company to go after them in court to reverse this.