

@somegeek@programming.dev please add [AIP] to the title, and reference the example here for how to format the disclosure
Thanks!


@somegeek@programming.dev please add [AIP] to the title, and reference the example here for how to format the disclosure
Thanks!


I’m doing some training stuff for work thats eating up my week, but I’ll help work through that with you later on if you’d like
The wiki itself is a slightly different bit, its the repo with .wiki at the end and it is its own thing (one of the oddities of codeberg wiki I mentioned)
You can also comment here or send me a message, or write it in your fork and let me know, whichever works. I don’t believe there is anything that I’d consider “uninteresting input” fwiw :)


Great idea! Putting it on the list, hopefully doing this update to the bar this weekend (I’ve got a few days of yet-another-cert training left still)


Yeah, you can also just make a PR
I’ll be able to get on there a little later today, doing a cert class today and tomorrow



Just go ahead and let me know what’s in the too advanced territory, and I’ll be happy to rework it
Edit: For the record, this is how we make it better and more accessible, which is the goal


Pfft I’d spin up a wiki before I’d do that!


So I’m going to suggest something slightly different - put it on both github and codeberg, then note that its synced from your local repo as a mirror and link it in a readme.
Gives you a few things
As for the server itself I’d say forgejo personally.


Doing what I can!
I’m still behind on responding to a few folks who have made offers to help, in the pipeline but we’ve had other… fun events (plus personal responsibilities eating up my time) which have gotten in the way of progress here and there.
And for the record, I consider myself maintenance crew!


Why would you?
The important part is your VMs and LXCs. Your Proxmox server, at most, requires configuration for specific needs (GPU passthrough for example). The only thing you need for that would be notes on configuration (unless you have this automated, in which case you don’t generally need that, just the notes in your scripts).
So a more important question, to me, is why do you want to back it up in the first place?


Part of the point of the [AIP] tag is your ability to filter these posts out.
The decision of what you want to do is obviously yours alone, though.


@traceapps@lemmy.world Please also include the required disclosures per rule 8, and let me know if you have any questions


What I’m hoping to go with is more something like a clamshell (think MNT Pocket Reform) or slider (like the old motorola droid). The Mecha Comet seems interesting but I’m not sure yet. I also like what WaveShare has going with the PocketTerm, but I want something other than a pi in there (I swore off RPi when they continued business sales and let prices skyrocket for the regular users who made them who they are).
I may also end up trying to put something together with spare parts I have, but we’ll see if I have the time for that.


The nonsense steps to even get there. The absolute nonsensical mess of lies in their claims to even do this in the first place. Lets be clear - if they wanted to block malware, they would need to be doing so from the Play store in the first place. So, lets highlight a few simple things:
To even suggest installing apps (which, lets be honest, that is what they are calling “sideloading” - doing the thing you do on your PC all the time) from a different location is the issue is far from reality. So any “promise” from them is worth functionally nothing to me.
As I said, I’m leaving Android either way. I shouldn’t have to go through such a massive number of hoops to install on my own device.


Unfortunately I was replying from my phone and didn’t notice. And yes, definitely trying to be patient given its a new rule and not exactly the easiest.
The up side is these are the sort of things that come up that make it easier to identify the holes - particularly the lack of examples. I’ll clear that up later today after I’m done with work.


The part that isn’t right (and sorry, was replying from my phone earlier so I didn’t notice) is the level of AI involvement.
So lets say the only AI assisted part was documentation, and it was fully generated - you’d put:
If you also had it suggest testing, but you implemented the tests themselves, that would be Hint, so it would look like this:
I think I should put a few examples in the post to make it clearer


Eh, I wouldn’t say useless.
I’d say they only account for user sentiment at best. Which can have an impact, but I’d say incredibly unlikely that there will be an impact on this one.
Not using android as much as possible will have a much higher impact though.


No worries, its a new rule following a slew of posts from brand new users promo’ing fully generated projects (and a pretty hefty community response as a result)
Thanks!


Thanks, just one more bit which would be the level of AI assistance:
Just for each part of it, I’ll update in my comment above
Visible here - thanks!