You don’t think frontier AI models are leaving some out deliberately?

In order to build the library you need access to Perforce, as that is where some of our dependencies live

…

An unofficial Minecraft-like game for luanti

Luanti is what Minetest was renamed to so it basically is Minetest

you are taking a risk either way. You are placing your trust in the dev and the few that can read code.

There is definitely a trust issue and a need for ways of conveying and building trust in smaller software projects. I think a much better solution there would be discussions about the code and how it works that aren’t hostile interrogations with foregone conclusions in pursuit of a broader anti-AI agenda. If someone just put a lot of effort into making something the details of that process should be on their mind, it should be possible to make them more accessible to people and convey that there is non-artificial understanding behind the project. Automatic hostility and suspicion makes those kinds of conversations harder and less likely.

That way a certain subset of members could just drive-by downvote without getting themselves dirty.

I think tags could be alright but only if this is not allowed, it is unreasonable to ask people to disclose something just so others can shit on them for it.

What would be better ways of doing it?

I like what this project is trying to do, self hosted security cameras need to be more accessible to get people to stop using corporate spyware.