2047

They should work in a browser no?

Some people want to be programmers. We enjoy the process.

These people just want attention. Or have been conned into the idea that with AI everything is easy.

And not eventually bought by some shady company.

If so Apple would reject the app from the App Store.

They have a new api that lets photos be backed up in the background similar to how the photos app does with iCloud. But… Immich cannot use it because Apple say you have to hard code the URL. That doesn’t work for self hosting.

No

Why don’t they support Background Resource Upload PhotoKit API on iOS?

Nm: I know why now. Apple are such bitches.

I agree.

Yeah it lets you have time to get some tea while it works.

works for deleted comments, but not when the entire post is nuked

True

Quote ppl you answer.

Nanopi. I have a couple. They’re not bad.

First rule of Usenet…

Okay then use a vpn.

Would you need to? Are apps a viable vector in? Basic auth in front of web ui does make sense though.

Another way:

Expose using caddy. Use basic auth for the web UI only. This exempts the Jellyfin app clients from basic auth that they don’t support but requires it before anyone even gets to the Jellyfin UI. This obfuscates the fact that your endpoint is even a Jellyfin end point.

This is how I do it.