SatyrSack

For what it’s worth, nothing in that link under the self-promotion rule mentions using that tag. It is only the link under the AI rule that instructs you to use one of those tags. If a developer did not use AI at all, they likely would not follow that link to read further into the AI rules and would therefore never see any rule instructing them to use some [CBH] tag. If you want non-AI developers to do something special, you should also mention that requirement under the relevant rule instead of just hiding that under the rules that only AI-devs will read the details of.

Originally training the model had used the energy resources of that original corporation or whatever. But when you download that model and start running it on your own hardware, you are using your own energy.

Think of it kind of like some software like Jellyfin. When the developers write the software, they do so using their own electricity. But when you download Jellyfin and actually run the software on your own hardware, you are now only using your electricity, not the developer’s electricity at all.

Where do you draw the line? If a user who is generally a very active poster here wrote a useful program and hosted the source on Codeberg under a FOSS license, should they be allowed to make a post sharing it?

So, basically an open source alternative to TinkerCAD? Just glancing over the main page and README, nothing looks like a concern here. Intriguing, if it actually works well.

https://github.com/joachimhs/akse3d

EDIT: It does not actually work well.

It is not just installing an app. It is more like flashing an alternate operating system entirely. Hopefully that does not sound too intimidating, because it is well worth it.

https://github.com/koreader/koreader/wiki/Installation-on-Kobo-devices