If everyone except billionaires has 100 votes, then everyone (except billionaires) has an equally weighted vote.

Again, this is not the system I want. I think one person, one vote is best. But if we’re altering the deal, fuck billionaires, you get no vote.

E: sorry for the comment spam, I was getting errors that said the comment wasn’t made when it actually was.

If everyone except billionaires has 100 votes, then everyone (except billionaires) has an equally weighted vote.

Again, this is not the system I want. I think one person, one vote is best. But if we’re altering the deal, fuck billionaires, you get no vote.

So? That already exists in the one person, one vote system. You think giving billionaires one less vote will make them not do AI propaganda?

Note: I think the one person, one vote system is best. I’m saying if we move away from it then billionaires should have significantly less say than they already do, not more.

Cool, as long as we’re moving away from one person, one vote, I say we should give billionaires zero and everyone else a hundred. Or we could do it by net worth (ending at 0, no fuckery with debt so that millionaires are poorer than hobos) so that the people the most fucked over get the most say on what should change.