• ryper@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 month ago

    Isn’t it a lack of rails that’s the problem, not a lack of rail cars? Passenger trains have to give way to cargo trains, and dedicated tracks are the solution.

      • Trex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        1 month ago

        Hopefully we’ll start prioritizing Passenger Cars over freight like the rest of the world

        • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 month ago

          We will be building a new high speed rail from Quebec to Toronto so passenger rail will finally be separate from freight rail. Finally drag our asses out of the 1800’s.

          • ryper@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 month ago

            The amount of money planned for that could probably cover twinning a much larger amount of existing track, with less environmental impact.

            • Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 month ago

              Why just twin the line and still have something designed in the 1800’s. Canadians are so damn cheap to do anything properly.

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 month ago

      Canada could also benefit from a shinkansen line or two. With population centers mostly along a straight line in the south, it would allow for rapid transit between major cities on dedicated passenger rail.

    • allen@rail.chat
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 month ago

      Freight right-of-way ownership is also a problem, but the car set they are replacing/adding to is 75+ years old, they are sturdy and reliable, but having more cars means that they could increase service beyond 3 trips a week on these routes. At the moment, occasional breakdowns and maintenance periods mean they face long distance equipment shortages sometimes.

      @ryper @radish6367

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 month ago

      Isn’t it a lack of rails that’s the problem, not a lack of rail cars?

      Thats one issue. This announcement addresses a different issue.

      The current VIA long-haul fleet is 70 year old equipment. It’s getting increasingly expensive to maintain, and if it isn’t replaced it will become almost impossible to keep them safely operating.

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      it’s both.

      Via is a shit service. yes, please charge me $200 for a 10 hour trip during which I will be knocking knees and playing footsie with the person across from me, with less space than an airplane seat has. I can’t wait for the privilege

      nah dude I’ll just drive for the same cost, less time, more flexibility, and more cargo capacity